Code Review in a Minute
Reviewing Large Changes
A practical order for reviewing big diffs without pretending you can absorb everything at once.
In one sentence
Reviewing a large change means prioritizing risk and evidence first, then scanning the remainder with explicit coverage limits.
Why it matters
Large human and agent changes are common. Linear top-to-bottom reading burns attention on low-risk files and leaves dangerous paths unchecked.
How it works
- Inventory files by risk: auth, data, money, permissions, migrations, networking, crypto.
- Read those paths fully before bulk refactors and formatting.
- Check tests and config that claim to cover the risky behavior.
- Skim mechanical files last; do not let them consume the review budget.
- Document what you did not deeply review if time forced a tradeoff.
Example
For a 120-file agent refactor, open the auth and payment directories first, then migration SQL, then tests named for those areas. Only afterward sample the rename-heavy packages.
What this proves
A risk-ordered review proves which high-impact paths were inspected and which evidence accompanied them.
What this does not prove
Finishing a large PR review does not prove every file was understood equally, or that unreviewed interactions cannot fail in production.
Last reviewed 2026-09-06. Title for citation: Code Review in a Minute: Reviewing Large Changes.