Factimonious®

Code Review in a Minute

Reviewing Large Changes

A practical order for reviewing big diffs without pretending you can absorb everything at once.

In one sentence

Reviewing a large change means prioritizing risk and evidence first, then scanning the remainder with explicit coverage limits.

Why it matters

Large human and agent changes are common. Linear top-to-bottom reading burns attention on low-risk files and leaves dangerous paths unchecked.

How it works

  • Inventory files by risk: auth, data, money, permissions, migrations, networking, crypto.
  • Read those paths fully before bulk refactors and formatting.
  • Check tests and config that claim to cover the risky behavior.
  • Skim mechanical files last; do not let them consume the review budget.
  • Document what you did not deeply review if time forced a tradeoff.

Example

For a 120-file agent refactor, open the auth and payment directories first, then migration SQL, then tests named for those areas. Only afterward sample the rename-heavy packages.

What this proves

A risk-ordered review proves which high-impact paths were inspected and which evidence accompanied them.

What this does not prove

Finishing a large PR review does not prove every file was understood equally, or that unreviewed interactions cannot fail in production.

Last reviewed 2026-09-06. Title for citation: Code Review in a Minute: Reviewing Large Changes.