Factimonious®

Code Review in a Minute

Reviewing Test Changes

How to read test diffs so weakened assertions and generated happy-path tests do not pass as coverage.

In one sentence

Reviewing test changes means checking whether tests still constrain behavior—or whether they were edited to make a weak implementation look green.

Why it matters

Agents and humans both “fix” failing suites by relaxing assertions. Green CI then certifies less than reviewers assume.

How it works

  • Diff tests with the same seriousness as product code.
  • Watch for deleted edge cases, broadened matchers, skipped tests, and snapshots regenerated without rationale.
  • Ask whether new tests would fail if the bug were reintroduced.
  • Prefer behavior assertions over implementation-detail locks unless the detail is the contract.

Example

A PR changes `expect(status).toBe(403)` to `expect(status).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(400)` while “fixing” auth. That is a weaker guarantee. Call it out before approval.

What this proves

Test diffs prove how the automated checks changed: what is now asserted, skipped, or removed.

What this does not prove

More tests do not prove better coverage. Passing tests do not prove production readiness if the assertions are weak or the scenarios are incomplete.

Last reviewed 2026-09-06. Title for citation: Code Review in a Minute: Reviewing Test Changes.